Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2008). Faking emotional intelligence (EI): Comparing response distortion on ability and trait-based EI measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(6), 761-784.
This study compared the susceptibility of two EI tests to faking. In a laboratory study, participants completed the EQ-i and the MSCEIT in two sessions. In the first session (i.e., the 'applicant condition'), participants were given a job description and asked to respond to the EI measures as though they were applying for that job. Participants returned 2 weeks later to repeat the tests in a 'non-applicant' condition in which they were told to answer as honestly as possible. Mean differences between 'applicant' and 'non-applicant' condition indicated that the EQ-i was more susceptible to faking than the MSCEIT. Results also revealed that participants were more likely to be selected for the job based on their applicant condition EQ-i scores than their non-applicant EQ-i scores, but they had an equal chance of being selected based on their MSCEIT scores from each condition. Implications for the use of these two EI tests are discussed.
Customer-oriented selling: Exploring the roles of emotional intelligence and organizational commitment Elizabeth J. Rozell, Charles E. Pettijohn *, R. Stephen Parker Southwest Missouri State University email: Charles E. Pettijohn (cep288f@smsu.edu)
*Correspondence to Charles E. Pettijohn, Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, Southwest Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65804
Côté, S. & Miners, C. T. H. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 1-28.
This study examined the relationship between EI, as measured by the MSCEIT, cognitive intelligence (CI), and job performance, as measured by supervisory ratings based on a 5-item scale adapted from McCarthy and Goffin (2001). Subjects were 175 managerial, administrative, and professional full-time employees of a large public university. Results found that CI moderated the association between EI and job performance. EI became a stronger predictor of job performance and organizational citizenship behavior directed at the organization (OCBO) (e.g., defend the organization when other employees criticize it) as CI decreased. Results suggest that using CI tests alone to predict job performance entails risk, because employees with low CI can perform effectively if they have high EI. The authors propose several mechanisms by which EI may enhance the job performance of individuals with low CI.